Started a new painting…

…kinda. I haven’t gotten to the canvas yet, I’m still working in Adobe Illustrator. But I do have the canvas bought and I’ve decided what’s going on it for the most part. I’m still toying with the idea of a background image or a flat color. Either way I like to document my process, so here’s a few pics from what i’ve done so far:

I draw the line-art out in red because it contrasts well against the image. There is no automated process that I’m using to create the outline. It’s hand-drawn with vector-based drawing tools.

(Vector tools mostly work like this:)

So it’s basically a process of boiling the details of her features down to as little as possible.

The lines look a little disconcerting on top of the picture, but you remove the pic and you get this:

This above is last night’s line work, and below is after adding further details tonight:

I started from the top-left “corner” of her face, beginning with the hair line across her forehead and then basically like reading a book, moved across and down… left eye brow and eye, right eye brow and eye, nose, mouth. I got to the corners of her mouth and realized I was going to need a secondary color for shadows in her face — which i try to stay away from using at all if I can. It’s easy to go overboard with too much shadow — and I kinda like the look of only shapes and lines.

Below is from the first experiments I did with color in Flash (it’s easier to color in Flash). This image is actually out-of-order — this was from last night’s line drawing without the details done, but I wanted to see what it would look like with a bit of color, especially in the hair. Coloring the hair always detracts from the eyes so it’s good to know early what you’re really dealing with.

This first pass isn’t very good, but it’s a sense of slightly more realistic colors than red #FF0000.

When I do have to use shadows in the face I try to keep the shapes fluid and purposeful. One of the things that really intrigues me is how three little shapes and two curved lines can accurately describe a nose.

The down-turns in the corner of the mouth are important. They capture a lot of the character in the expression. The eyes definitely require the most work with all of their detail, but eyes are easy in a sense because they are very contoured and are well defined, which makes them easy to draw. There’s not a whole lot that’s linear about a nose… but it’s funny, I often find that not much nose is necessary. Lips have always been hard. Unless you are wearing lip-stick, lips do not have edges. Upper lips have a bit of definition across the top, but buttom lips kinda just… fade into your face. I’ve found that it always helps to make the bottom lip just a little small.

Then with a background:

This is a house down the street from me — a goreous house. I’ve been wanting to paint this house for a while now so I’m hoping to put it into this painting. But that’s so much more work. Ugh. It means weeks and not days… procrastination… laziness. I’m considering simplifying the drawing of the house and not worrying about the details of it so much as I did on my previous Nola Porch painting.

This is my daughter Elise, by the way, who is turning 8 on Sunday.

jvanpelt - July 28th, 2009

Fred Tomaselli at Prospect 1

A few months ago Dan Cameron came and spoke to the creative department at Peter Mayer about an upcoming city wide art show — a biennial — the first of which is called Prospect 1. The show is meant to happen every two years (hence the title) for 10 years: Prospect 1, Prospect 2, … Prospect 5. He talked a bit about his background, the background of biennials in the art world, and a bit about the artists being showcased.

One of those artists is Fred Tomaselli. From Wikipedia:

Fred Tomaselli (born in Santa Monica, California in 1956) is an American artist. He is best known for his highly detailed paintings on wood panels, combining an array of unorthodox materials suspended in a thick layer of clear, epoxy resin.

This past weekend was the last weekend for Prospect 1 so I took the family and a friend out to see a few sites. Fred’s work was hung in the old U.S. Mint on the corner of Decatur and Esplanade in literally the last room of the last museum we visited, but for me it was the pinnacle of everything we’d seen. When Dan first spoke to us and showed us slides, I was impressed by Fred Tomaselli’s work. But seeing a few slides (or a few pictures on the web) does not compare to seeing these pieces up close.

He works with mixed media: paint; pictures of eyes, hands, lips, etc from magazines; pills; leaves… then coats his pieces in a thick layer of clear epoxy. My friend and I were discussing how most of the art that we like has a lot to do with the creative process, not just the end results. Honestly, many artists’ end results just aren’t that impressive. Something my wife and I discussed was that as a whole Tomaselli’s compositions aren’t necessarily that great. That sounds a bit harsh, but what I mean is that the real beauty in his work is in the details. He creates these great swirling patterns, made of dots of paint and tiny pictures of eyes and butterflies and leaves from his garden and benadryl tablets and all of this stuff. The pieces are huge and you stand in front of them and look at this massive black space full of fireworks. There’s so much depth and texture, yet it’s all trapped in this thick epoxy. I don’t know what the symbolism is in these magazine cut-outs of life, arranged in this dazzling display, yet trapped like they’re stuck in amber.

But I don’t think it’s about symbolism. I don’t think that symbolism is really as premeditated as people expect that it is, anyway. Fred Tomaselli says that his works are “eye candy” and I’d believe they’re not necessarily meant to be anything more than that. But that’s also why they work, it’s what makes them good.

Of course, everyone in the city sees this and thinks “Mardi Gras beads?”

jvanpelt - January 19th, 2009